Legal Opinion

Sizemore v. Kirkland Timber Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 1930No. 3906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOdom, J.

Plaintiff alleges that he was employed as a common laborer by the defendant, and that while at work in the course of his employment he was accidentally injured, and that as a result he is now totally and permanently disabled. He prays for compensation for four hundred weeks under the Compensation Acts.

The defense is: First, that plaintiff was not employed by defendant at the time he was injured; and, second, if it should be held that he was its employee at the time, his injuries were slight, soon healed, and he was discharged by his physician as well at the end of thirty days.

From a judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. James v. Spence & Goldstein, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. LeBlanc v. Ohio Oil Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Joseph v. Higgins Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Hicks v. White Crandin Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carnelious v. Louisiana Industrial Life Ins.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Wilson v. Union Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API