Legal Opinion

Daniel v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 25, 1948No. 24050PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

The offense is theft by false pretext of property over the value of fifty dollars. The punishment assessed is confinement in the penitentiary for a term of eight years.

The State’s evidence is ample to show that appellant by false and fraudulent representations obtained from Ellen Harmon $241.40. There is no denial of the alleged false pretext resorted to in obtaining the money, nor is there any question as to the identity of appellant as the perpetrator of the offense. Appellant did not testify or offer any affirmative defense on any issue. No evidence was introduced…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gilbraith v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Gray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Fielder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  4. Kelley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892
  5. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ball v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
  2. Wiley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. Wise v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Stewart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. Angel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API