Legal Opinion

Qualls v. United States Elevator Corp.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 26, 1993No. 75729PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice.

Two issues are presented on certiorari: (1) Did the trial court commit reversible error by instructing on a res ipsa loquitur pattern of proof? (2) Is there competent evidence to support the jury verdict? We answer the first question in the negative and the second in the affirmative.

I

THE ANATOMY OF THE LITIGATION

Nancy Qualls [Qualls] and a friend were in an automatic elevator in the Shawnee Medical Center [Hospital] on December 9, 1987 when the elevator fell from the second floor and stopped suddenly in the basement. Qualls claims to have suffered injuries to her back. She…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Dermatossian v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Evans v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Thompson v. Presbyterian Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Zeier v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  2. Jackson v. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Harder v. F.C. Clinton, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Smith v. HinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  5. Copeland v. Admiral Pest Control Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API