Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Agarita Music, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is defendant Agarita Music, Inc.’s (“Agarita”) motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, to transfer (Docket No. 11) 1 . For the reasons set forth below, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the motion to transfer is DENIED as moot.
This case is one of several hundred 2 filed by plaintiffs against various defendants in which plaintiffs allege that the defendants, all entities and/or individuals associated with the “rap” or “hip-hop” music industry, have infringed upon plaintiffs’ copyrights in several sound recordings and musical…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Boles v. National Development Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- Ihf Ltd. v. Myra BagDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019
- First Tennessee National Corp. v. Horizon National BankDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2002
- Mitchell v. Capitol Records, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2017
- Caboodles Cosmetics, Ltd. Partnership v. Caboodles, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.