Legal Opinion

State v. Campbell

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided January 25, 2013No. 20100840-CAPublished

1Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

T 10 Campbell seeks reconsideration of our affirmance of the trial court's decision to not instruct the jury on a lesser included offense. We reaffirm that possession of drug paraphernalia is not an included offense of possession of a controlled substance because the two offenses require proof of different elements to sustain a conviction. Although the petition for rehearing is otherwise denied, Campbell identifies some concerns with our prior decision that merit comment and clarification.

T11 The thrust of Campbell's petition is that this court misapprehended State v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. BakerUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. ShondelUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. KrugerUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. BryanUtah Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API