Legal Opinion

State v. Pierce

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1972No. 2242PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Chief Justice.

The defendant, Phillip Cecil Pierce, was charged with one count of child molesting and one count of rape. Prior to trial, and pursuant to a plea bargain, the defendant plead guilty to rape in the second degree, the two initial charges against him being dismissed. The record clearly reflects that the defendant plead guilty because he felt that there was a high probability that if he went to trial, he would be found guilty. The defendant therefore elected to take advantage of the plea bargain. This procedure was specifically approved in North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. NelsonArizona Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. MinceyArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. State v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  4. State v. DommeArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. ReddingMontana Supreme Court · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API