Legal Opinion

State v. Capawanna

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 26, 1938PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in its opinion. We reserve, however, and do not pass upon, the question of whether the admission in evidence of a certain X-ray photograph was error.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Lloyd, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Woles-Keil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. LeckisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  2. State v. RileyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  3. State v. BoeningNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  4. State v. MaxwellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  5. State v. BunkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API