Legal Opinion
First Western Bank & Trust v. Wickman
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 13, 1995No. Civ. 940284PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
Alice Wickman appeals from an order denying her motion to partially vacate a prior judgment. The motion was made under Rule 60(b)(iv), N.D.R.Civ.P., alleging the foreclosure judgment was partially void to the extent the amount exceeded the amount stated in the notice before foreclosure. We affirm the order, holding the notice before foreclosure does not affect the actual amount due.
I
Alice Wickman received $600,000 from First Western Bank & Trust in exchange for a mortgage on Wickman’s real property. Wickman defaulted on the loan and the bank immediately accelerated the full…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- First National Bank of Crosby v. BjorgenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- State Bank of Towner v. HansenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- First Western Bank v. WickmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Larson v. JacobsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- Northwestern National Life Insurance Co. v. DelzerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Owens v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Medical Arts Clinic, P.C. v. Franciscan Initiatives, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Roe v. DoeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- McKenzie County Social Service Board v. C.G.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Alliance Pipeline L.P. v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.