Legal Opinion

G. A. C. Service Corp. v. De Ruvo

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1961Published

1Opinion of the CourtThomas P. Farley, J.

In an action for alleged breach of a contract by the defendant, a retail automobile dealer, the plaintiff, a finance company, moves to strike the answer as sham and frivolous and for summary judgment.

It appears that the parties, as part of the transaction assigning a “ retail installment contract ” to the plaintiff, agreed to a written indorsement, which provided: “If you [the plaintiff] repossess the car, we [the defendant] will upon demand pay you the then unpaid balance * * *. You [the plaintiff] agree to protect us [the defendant] against any loss in excess of $100 due to any one single…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. H. C. King Motor Sales Corp. v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  2. MEADOW BROOK NAT'L BANK OF FREEPORT v. FerkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API