Legal Opinion

Topliff v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1902PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. George K. Ingham, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs

This is an appeal from the judgment of the county court of- Cook county confirming a special assessment levied to pay the cost of curbing, grading and paving with granite top macadam One Hundred and Fifteenth street, from Michigan avenue to Wentworth avenue, in the city of Chicago.

Section 1 of the ordinance provides that “the roadway of One Hundred and Fifteenth street from the west line of Michigan to the east curb line of Wentworth avenue, said roadway being thirty-eight feet in width, and also the roadways of all intersecting streets and alleys extended from the curb line to the street…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kohlhof v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Murphy v. City of PeoriaIllinois Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. City of Elmhurst v. BuettgenIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Hulbert v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  4. Wilmot v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Clark v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API