Legal Opinion

Ballard v. Scruggs

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1891PublishedCited by 12 opinions

EROM SEVIER. Appeal from Chancery Court of Sevier County. II. R. Gibson, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtLubton, J.

This is an ejectment hill to recover possession of two undivided one-ninth interests in a tract of six hundred acres of land.

Complainants claim to have acquired the title of the defendants by virtue of judgments, levy, and sale, and exhibit a Sheriff’s deed for the intei'ests they seek to recover.

Many objections have been urged to the prov ceedings under which complainants claim, only one of which need be determined.

T. and E. B. Scruggs owned each a one-ninth interest in the lands in controversy. Judgments were rendered against them, and executions levied upon the interest of each as tenants…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Knoxville v. GervinTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Sheafer v. MitchellTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Shepard v. LanierTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Williams v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
  5. Blackwell v. Memphis Street Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API