Legal Opinion
FC Broadway and Hill v. Rachel Holmes
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 1, 2022No. 2:22-cv-01232Unknown
1Opinion
Case 2:22-cv-01232-MWF-PLA Document Filed 03/01/22 Pagelof3 Page ID #:21 2 4 JS-6 6 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ? | EC BROADWAY AND HILL, LLC, CASE NUMBER: 10 11 CV 22-1232-MWE (PLAx) Plaintiff 12 v. 13 || RACHEL HOLMES, et al., ORDER REMANDING CASE TO 14 STATE COURT Defendant(s). jw 16 17 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 18 || County of Los Angeles for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. 19 “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 20 | court…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Nevada v. Bank of America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.