Legal Opinion

State v. Brand

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 1, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 47 Vroom 267.

1Opinion of the Court

*487The opinion of the court was delivered by

PiTNEY, CHANCELLOR.

The defendants were convicted in the Mercer Quarter Sessions upon an indictment charging that they did willfully and maliciously aid, counsel, procure and consent to the setting fire to and burning of certain goods, wares and merchandise, which at the time were insured against loss or damage by fire, with intent to prejudice certain insurance companies mentioned in the several counts of the indictment. The Supreme Court upon error affirmed tire conviction, and the defendants have sued out writs of error from this court.

It is argued…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MerkleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  2. State Board of Medical Examiners v. KempkesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
  3. State v. McGovernSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  4. State v. ElwellOregon Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API