Legal Opinion

State v. Kendall

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided August 8, 2014No. 106960PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Rosen, J.:

Following a bench trial, the Reno County District Court found Mark Kendall guilty of stalking and violating a protective order based on his July 7, 2010, acts of placing telephone calls from the State prison in El Dorado, where he was an inmate, to his former wife, D.K. Notably, D.K. and Kendall never spoke over the telephone, but based on her phone’s caller ID, D.K. knew that Kendall was calling her from the prison.

On appeal, a majority of tire Court of Appeals panel agreed with Kendall that insufficient evidence was presented at trial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. McCaslinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. State v. ArnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  3. State v. UrbanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  4. State v. StaffordSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. DunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  2. State v. JollySupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  3. State v. CastleberrySupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  4. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025
  5. State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API