Wood v. Chicago Title Agency of Las Vegas, Inc.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
FACTS
In 1984 Robert Chapman (“Chapman”) and Dasco, Inc. (“Dasco”) were embroiled in litigation (the “Dasco litigation”). Chicago Title Agency of Las Vegas, Inc. (“Chicago Title”) held in an escrow account (the “account”) money which was the subject matter of the dispute. Chicago Title was not a party to the Dasco litigation.
In March 1986 for valuable consideration, Chapman executed to Wood a promissory note in the amount of $17,092.89. The note was payable “on or before the Dasco Settlement . . . .”
In April 1986 Chapman assigned his interest in the account to Wood. In September 1986…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Martinez v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Poirier v. Board of Dental ExaminersNevada Supreme Court · 1965
- Business Financial Services, Inc. v. AGN Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Self v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
4Cited by4 opinions
- Easton Business Opportunities, Inc. v. Town Executive Suites-Eastern Marketplace, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2010
- Aurora National Life Assurance Co. v. HarrisonDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2006
- AICCO, Inc. v. Lisowski (In Re Silver State Helicopters, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2009
- Horner v. SemenzaNevada Supreme Court · 2013