Stephens v. Smartt
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee
In Equity. On pleas to jurisdiction and motions for preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
SANFORD, District Judge.
These consolidated causes were heard on the pleas in abatement, which had been set down for argument by the complainants under the thirty-third equity rule, and on the complainants’ motions for preliminary injunctions.
Finley v. Williams et al.
The bill in this case was filed by Finley, a citizen of Georgia, against Williams and I f other individuals, all citizens of Tennessee, and the First Cumberland ° Presbyterian Church of Chattanooga, Tenn., a corporation under the laws of Tennessee. It avers :
That complainant: is a member of said church, and a regular attendant on…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Watson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Meyer v. Construction CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Anderson v. WattSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Morris v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Pacific Railroad v. KetchumSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chickasaw Wood Products Co. v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
- Sharp v. BonhamDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1913