Legal Opinion
McDonald v. Swope
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 24, 1948No. 28210PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner on the hearing of the order to show cause filed an amended petition, upon which the writ was issued. The Warden made h,is return and it was stipulated that the amended petition should be deemed petitioner’s traverse to the return.
Hearing was had. The petitioner did not testify but offered in evidence the depositions of Judge Moinet, who presided at the trial on which petitioner was convicted, of United States Attorney Babcock, prosecuting him, and of George F. Curran, the attorney defending him. * Petitioner, without counsel, and Assistant United States…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- William Brown, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Beesley v. Hartford Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1989
- Swope v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1966
- Deerfield Automotive, LLC v. Hyundai Motor America CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.