Vamos ex rel. Adams v. Tabachnick
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County
Assumpsit. Rule to show cause why statement should not be stricken from the record. C. P. Northampton Co., Sept. T., 1921, No. 92.
1Opinion of the Court
Stewart, P. J.,
This is a rule to show cause why the statement of claim should not be stricken off. The first reason is that the plaintiff’s cause of action is founded on the record of a judgment in a court of New York State, and that the record shows it was based' on certain promissory notes, and that the record of the judgment has no copy of the promissory notes attached to the same. That is not necessary. The statement has attached to it a duly certified copy of the record, and it shows personal service on the defendants in that suit. This court will not permit that record to be impeached,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Adams v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- Guaranty Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Commonwealth ex rel. State Hospital for the Insane v. County of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- C. H. Hardy Auto Co. v. PoseySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Montgomery v. CookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1837
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.