Legal Opinion

Clinton Trust Co. v. 142-144 Joralemon Street Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 10, 1933PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScudder, J.

Were this an appeal from the usual judgment of foreclosure and sale, the plaintiff, respondent, would be entitled to an affirmance.

Due, however, to the raising anew of certain collateral objections, considered on former appeals, but now for the first time presented in the record through the medium of documentary evidence, we deem it presently our duty to prescribe the procedure to be followed by the trial court in its consideration of the issues presented by these objections.

The action was brought to foreclose a trust mortgage covering a large business building, against which mortgage…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Graselli Chemical Co. v. Ætna Explosives Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  2. Central Trust Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  3. James v. . CowingNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Missouri Pac. Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1916
  5. Equitable Trust Co. v. Western Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Monaghan v. MayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  2. Chemical Bank and Trust Co. v. Adam Schumann Associates, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank of Lockport v. Eagle Building Co.New York Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Town of Vienna v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1953
  5. Chase National Bank v. 10 East Fortieth Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API