Legal Opinion
Chas. H. Moureau Co. v. Domenge
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 28, 1944No. 31641PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GIBSON, V.C.J.
The petitioner urges that under 85 O. S. 1941 §§ 28, 29, and 84, the Industrial Commission has a continuing power or jurisdiction to make such modifications or changes with respect to final awards as may be justified, and that these modifications or changes may be made upon the application of any party in interest, including the employer, upon a showing that the condition of the employee or claimant has improved subsequent to the entry of the award and before full payment thereof.
The facts in this case are that on November 6, 1942, the claimant, Domenge, was in the employ of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Glasgow v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Skelton Lead & Zinc Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Marland v. ForresterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Thomas Conlin Co. v. GuckianSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Reams v. MalcolmSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
3Cited by2 opinions
- Baroid Division National Lead Company v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Denver Producing & Refining Co. v. WhatleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948