Legal Opinion

Davis v. Graniss

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1839PublishedCited by 3 opinions

ERROR to the La Porte Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

Assumpsit by C. B. Graniss and others against Davis and one Allison on a promissory note. Davis appeared and pleaded to the action. Allison, on whom process had been' duly served, entered no appearance. An issue was made on the plea filed by Davis. Verdict and judgment against Davis alone.

This judgment must be reversed. The error consists in taking judgment against one of the defendants only. The principles which govern suits against joint contractors are, we presume, familiar to all. A judgment by default should have been taken against Allison, and the jury that tried the issue made on the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kincaid v. PurcellIndiana Supreme Court · 1849
  2. Goodhue v. PalmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Kincaid v. PurcelIndiana Supreme Court · 1848

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API