State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Wilson
Ohio Supreme Court
Proceedings in quo warranto.
1Opinion of the CourtGilmore, J.
This proceeding was commenced by the-attorney-general in pursuance of a joint resolution of the-general assembly.
The information charges that the defendant has usurped and intruded into, and does now usurp, the office of medical superintendent of the hospital for the insane at Athens; “ he, the said Charles L. Wilson, not being an elector of the State of Ohio, but a resident and elector of the State-of Indiana.”
The plea, though otherwise sufficient, fails to traverse-this allegation, and on this ground is demurred to.
The only question presented is, whether the place of medical superintendent…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Shelby v. AlcornMississippi Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by13 opinions
- State ex rel. Clyatt v. HockerSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
- State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Questions Submitted by the House of Representatives, March 20, 1901Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1901
- Andrews v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- City of Ellsworth v. RossiterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.