Legal Opinion

Smith v. Lombard

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 3, 1986No. CA-4923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ARMSTRONG, Judge. Before GULOTTA, SCHOTT, GARRISON, LOBRANO and ARMSTRONG, JJ.

Pursuant to LSA-R.S. — 18:4911 plaintiff, J. Carlyle Smith, brought suit against Rudy Lombard challenging Lombard’s qualifications as a candidate for Mayor of the City of New Orleans. After a trial on the merits, the district court held that Lombard did not qualify as a candidate for mayor. Lombard appeals from that decision. We reverse.

Section 4-202 of the New Orleans Home Rule Charter provides as follows:

Qualifications. The Mayor shall be a citizen of the United States by birth, a qual*1078ified elector of the City,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Slocum v. DeWittLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. Stavis v. EnglerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Tomlinson v. FrazierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. LombardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API