Legal Opinion

McGill v. Brown

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1913No. 10751PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Myers, J., entered March 27, 1912, in favor of the claimant, in a proceeding against a receiver for money received, after trial on the merits to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

This proceeding was brought by E. P. Jami-son & Company, a corporation, against the receiver in the case of McGill v. Brown et al., to require the receiver in that case to pay over to E. P. Jamison & Company the proceeds of a warrant, amounting to the sum of $425.08, wrongfully collected by the receiver. The trial court, after hearing the evidence, made the order as prayed for. The receiver has appealed.

*515There is substantially no dispute upon the facts, which are as follows: On May 4, 1910, Neta Brown, Florence C. Dawson and C. N. Dawson were copartners, doing business under the name of the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weber Showcase & Fixture Co. v. WaughDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1930
  2. North Coast Dry Kiln Co. v. Montecoma Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Johnson-Stephens & Shinkle Shoe Co. v. Marlatt & Miller, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API