Legal Opinion
Cobb Publishing, Inc. v. Hearst Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 16, 1995No. 2:93-cv-71771PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
BORMAN, District Judge.
Background
Defendants Hearst and Dow Jones have moved, by their attorneys, Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone (hereinafter MC) for Reconsideration of this Court’s Order of Disqualification of MC dated January 31, 1995 (hereinafter “January 31, 1995 Order”). 1 That Order applied the Local Rule of the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan 111.1(d), which adopted the Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct, (hereinafter MRPC), in particular MRPC 1.10(b). MC’s Motion for Reconsideration does not challenge…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Panduit Corp. v. All States Plastic Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Lasalle National Bank and Lake Properties Venture v. County of Lake and the Village of GrayslakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Eleanor Schiessle v. Donald E. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Novo Terapeutisk Laboratorium A/s v. Baxter Travenol Laboratories, Inc., Gist-Brocades Fermentation Industries, Inc., and Gist-Brocades N. V.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Ez Paintr Corporation v. Padco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance Company Of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania v. Alticor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- National Union Fire Insurance v. Alticor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007