DeCourley v. Tucker

WADDILL, Commissioner.

The question presented'by this-appeal is. whether the trial court correctly construed the will of Lydiá Pfirard (1) as devising no> ■ remainder interest in' certain real estate -to *338the appellants and (2) as authorizing the appellees to sell this property.

The provisions of testatrix’s will which give rise to this controversy read:

“I also give to my said daughters one-fourth each of my real property, wheresoever situate which I may own or have the right to dispose of at my death, and to my grandsons, Gene W. Parard and Toussaint W. Parard the remaining one-fourth to be…