Legal Opinion
Vitaly Smagin v. Ashot Yegiazaryan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 31, 2018No. 16-55502Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JUL 31 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS VITALY IVANOVICH SMAGIN, Nos. 16-55502 16-56749 Petitioner-Appellee, 17-56467 v. D.C. No. 2:14-cv-09764-R-PLA ASHOT YEGIAZARYAN, AKA Ashot Central District of California, Egiazaryan, Los Angeles Respondent-Appellant. ORDER Before: ROGERS,* BYBEE, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. The panel judges have voted to deny Smagin’s Petition for Rehearing. Judges Bybee and Watford voted to deny the Petition for Rehearing En Banc, and Judge Rogers recommended denying the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. HaegerSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Peacock v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Princess Lida of Thurn and Taxis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- David M. Fink v. James H. Gomez, Director, Diana Carloni NourseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Penn Central Casualty Co. v. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. SchnaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.