Legal Opinion

State ex rel. U. S. Norton v. Lupton

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1877PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Jasper County Court of Common Pleas. K. C., St. Jo. & C. B. R. R. vs. Nelson, 62 Mo. 585; State to use vs. Lingo, 26 Mo. 500 ; High Leg. Rem., 437, 606, 676; State ex rel. vs. Stewart, 82 Mo. 381-382; State vs. Tail, 53 Mo. 107 ; State ex rel. vs. Lawrence, 389 ; Dil. Corp. Ed. 72, § 772 ; People vs. Serugham, 20 Barb. 302.

1Opinion of the CourtHough, Judge

This was an information in the nature of a quo warranto, brought at the relation of W. S. Norton against the defendant, Lupton, for an alleged intrusion into and usurpation of the office of city marshal of the town of Joplin.

It appears from the record that the defendant was in October, 1873, elected city marshal of said town of Joplin, and soon thereafter duly qualified and entered upon the discharge of his duties. In the following April an order was made by the city council, removing him from office for some alleged official misconduct, and the relator was appointed to fill his place. In…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Attorney General v. VailSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1870

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mullen v. DohertyWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Reynolds v. State, ex rel. TitusIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. State ex rel. Major v. Arkansas Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  4. State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  5. State ex rel. Heimburger v. WellsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API