Glabman v. State

Although the defendant claims that the $600 per month in restitution required as a condition of her probation is beyond her means, we find that the sum fixed by the trial court represents an appropriate balance between the large amount, over $200,-000, she embezzled from her employer and is therefore required to repay, on the one hand, and her ability to do so, on the other. Hence, there was no error in the exercise *1338of the authority conferred by sections 775. 089(l)(a), (6), Florida Statutes (1985).1

The other point raised also lacks merit.

Affirmed.. Sections 775.089(l)(a), (6), Florida…