Commonwealth v. Wing Ng
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
This case, here on further appellate review, concerns the circumstances in which a companion of a person *237who is arrested pursuant to a warrant lawfully may be subjected to a “pat frisk.” The Appeals Court rejected the idea that the police have an automatic right to pat frisk a companion in the company of one who has been lawfully arrested. Commonwealth v. Wing Ng, 37 Mass. App. Ct. 283, 287 (1994). It concluded that opinions favoring such a bright-line rule were not consistent with the Fourth Amendment principles of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), under which the frisk of a person is…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Commonwealth v. FraserMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Owens v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
- Commonwealth v. BermentMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
- Commonwealth v. PrevostMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Commonwealth v. CalderonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.