Chadwick v. Scarth
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
This action for declaratory and injunc-tive relief arose from a dispute as to which of two groups of individuals comprises the Methuen Housing Authority (authority). After the parties had entered into a statement of agreed facts, the judge reported the case to this court without decision.
The plaintiffs had been elected to the authority by the town in 1968, 1969 and 1970, respectively, pursuant to identical provisions of G. L. c. 121, § 26L (as in effect prior to St. 1969, c. 751, § 2), and G. L. c. 121B, § 5 (inserted by St. 1969, c. 751, § 1): "In a town, four members [of the housing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Mailhot v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Del Duca v. Town Administrator of MethuenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jesus Pimentel v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Town Council v. Town ManagerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Blaser v. Town Manager of MethuenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Jesus Pimentel v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020