Kleinschmidt v. McAndrews
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF MONTANA. The plaintiffs in error, who were plaintiffs below, brought an action of replevin in the District Court for the Third Judicial District in the Territory of Montana, for the recovery of personal property Avhich had be'en taken under a writ of attachment by the defendant McAndrews, as sheriff, at the instance of the other defendant, Bristol, a creditor of one Ingersoll, whose goods he claimed them to have been at the time…
Read the full summary
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF MONTANA. The plaintiffs in error, who were plaintiffs below, brought an action of replevin in the District Court for the Third Judicial District in the Territory of Montana, for the recovery of personal property Avhich had be'en taken under a writ of attachment by the defendant McAndrews, as sheriff, at the instance of the other defendant, Bristol, a creditor of one Ingersoll, whose goods he claimed them to have been at the time of the levy. The plaintiffs claimed title by virtue of a bill of sale from Ingersoll, made before the seizure under the…
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. JustiCE Matthews
delivered the opinion of the court. After stating the case as above reported, he continued:
The Supreme Court of Montana, in affirming the judgment of the District Court, proceeded on the ground that the errors ’ assigned could not be considered for want of a sufficient bill of exceptions. It was held by that court that, in the nature of the case, an exception, within the-meaning of § 279 of the Mon tana Code of Civil Procedure, could not be taken to the ruling of the court sustaining the motion for a nonsuit and directing judgment to be entered in favor of the defendants,…
2Cited by9 opinions
- La Bonte v. Mutual Fire & Lightning InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1925
- Krauss Brothers Lumber Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Emerson v. Eldorado Ditch Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1896
- McKay v. Montana Union Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1892
- Pattison v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburgh Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.