Glassell-Hicks Co. v. Smith

HAMITER, Judge.

A judgment against defendant for the sum of $109.33 is asked by plaintiff in this suit. Of the mentioned amount $95 is alleged to be for money advances made, while the balance, or $14.33, is claimed as interest that has accrued on the funds loaned.

There was judgment in the trial court in favor of plaintiff for $95. The interest item was rejected. Defendant appealed.

This court has no jurisdiction of the appeal. The case is of a civil nature and is one of which the district court had concurrent jurisdiction; and when the aforementioned interest charge is excluded or eliminated…