Legal Opinion

Sherrod v. McGruder

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 19, 1923No. 2 Div. 799PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit, after revival, was against several defendants and resulted in judgment for plaintiffs. The appeal was taken and error assigned by only one of the defendants in judgment.

The fact that the appeal is taken only by Etta Sherrod is attested by the “notice of appeal,” notice thereof “to attorneys for plaintiffs,” and in her “appeal bond.”- Co-defendants are not shown to ■ have been brought in by notice or summons issued .out of the circuit court or out of this court.

In the case of an appeal by one of co-defendants, in order that this court may have jurisdiction of the other parties…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Louisville N. R. Co. v. ShikleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Gerald v. HayesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. Burnett v. RomanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. Roman v. LentzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Beatty v. McMillanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. McKinstry v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  4. Rush v. Newsom Exterminators, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  5. Mancill v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API