Legal Opinion

Doe v. Dinkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 29, 1993PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Rosenberger, J..

It was not an abuse of discretion to grant the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction directing the municipal defendants to reduce the population at two homeless shelters to 200 beds each, to cease the placement of individuals in certain areas of one of the shelters and to cure existing fire code violations.

The plaintiffs James Doe, a resident of the Sumner Avenue Armory Men’s Shelter, John Roe, a resident of the Franklin Avenue Armory Men’s Shelter, and The Legal Action Center for the Homeless, instituted this action on behalf of all past and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. W. T. Grant Co. v. SrogiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Klostermann v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Aetna Insurance v. CapassoNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Tucker v. ToiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. McCain v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Henrietta D. v. GiulianiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
  2. Brad H. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Healthworld Corp. v. GottliebAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. Gloria Vanderbilt Home Furnishings, Inc. v. CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. City of New York v. New York State Division of the BudgetNew York Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API