Legal Opinion

Claim of Richard v. George Noland Drilling Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1958No. 2841PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

*128OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · ParkerJustice Parker

Claims were filed under the Wyoming Workmen’s Compensation Law by Lillian Richard, widow of C. B. Richard, and by James E. Barrett, guardian ad litem of Clyde Brent Richard, Jr., and Barbara Mary Richard, minor heirs of deceased. Death occurred because of asphyxiation during a time when Richard was lying near a butane stove in the lower doghouse at employer’s oil well drilling rig, known as Roth No. 2. The matters were tried as one case, and the court denied relief, finding against claimants and concluding as matters of law that:(1) Decedent in entering upon employer’s premises was in…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rayburne v. QueenWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
  2. State v. FaulknerWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Arnold v. JenningsWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Woolsulate, Inc. v. Fremont Lumber Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1956

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jim's Water Service v. EayrsWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Railworks, Inc. v. NaylorWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Smith v. Husky Terminal Restr., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Svoboda v. Wyoming State Treasurer ex rel. Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Richard v. GEO. NOLAND DRILLING CO.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API