Legal Opinion
Divet v. Reinisch
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 8, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Greenfield, J.), entered on September 28, 1989, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 for an order dismissing the second, third and fourth counterclaims, unanimously modified, on the law, to reinstate the second counterclaim only to the extent that it pleads a cause of action for libel based on the statement: "it appears Hans Reinisch and DUTC may be using DUTC funds and taxpayers’ money to harass building residents by filing false information with City agencies”, and otherwise affirmed without costs.
We agree with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. Gilbert Gottlieb & 220 Crescent, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. SansaneseNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Ford v. LevinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Mase v. ReillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pisani v. Staten Island University HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Hughes Training, Inc. v. Pegasus Real-Time, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Lowinger v. State University of New York Health Science CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992