Legal Opinion

People v. Iden

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1914No. Crim. No. 328PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County and from an order refusing a new trial. J. A. Allen, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

On information filed by the district attorney of Tulare County the defendant was accused of the crime of felony committed as follows: It was charged that the defendant, on or about the twenty-sixth day of September, 1912, at said county, was'the mortgagor of the following described personal property, to wit: Twenty-five head of dairy cows, twenty-one head of which said cows were branded “I” on the left hip, and which said personal property was then and there located on certain real property described in the information; all of which said personal property had been theretofore mortgaged by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. People v. PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Steed v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  4. People v. WolfromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  5. Nixon v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. People v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  3. State v. BatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API