United States v. Anthony Melvin Azadian
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
Appellant was convicted, under 18 U. S.C. §§ 2 and 201(c), of aiding and abetting the bribing of a public official, an employee of a draft board. On appeal, he urges that his conviction cannot stand because the principal in the case *82was found not guilty by reason of entrapment. We disagree and affirm.
Three persons were prosecuted on a multi-count indictment. Diane Daniel was an employee of Local Group B in Pasadena, California, and had access to Selective Service files in that office. Gary Stevens Langley was a registrant with Local Board 94, located at the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Samuel Jacento Ortega v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Javier Carbajal-Portillo, Rafael Vega-Picos v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Hurley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
3Cited by21 opinions
- Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- United States v. NoahCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. F. W. StandeferCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Charles Thomas Bryan and James Eston Echols. Appeal of Charles Thomas BryanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.