Legal Opinion

United States v. Anthony Melvin Azadian

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 1, 1971No. 25772_1PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:

Appellant was convicted, under 18 U. S.C. §§ 2 and 201(c), of aiding and abetting the bribing of a public official, an employee of a draft board. On appeal, he urges that his conviction cannot stand because the principal in the case *82was found not guilty by reason of entrapment. We disagree and affirm.

Three persons were prosecuted on a multi-count indictment. Diane Daniel was an employee of Local Group B in Pasadena, California, and had access to Selective Service files in that office. Gary Stevens Langley was a registrant with Local Board 94, located at the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Samuel Jacento Ortega v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  2. Javier Carbajal-Portillo, Rafael Vega-Picos v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  3. Hurley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. United States v. NoahCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. F. W. StandeferCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. Charles Thomas Bryan and James Eston Echols. Appeal of Charles Thomas BryanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API