Legal Opinion

Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Goode

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 25, 1894No. 334PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Grayson.

1Opinion of the Court

RAINEY, Associate Justice.

Conclusions of Fact.—In the year 1891, on four different occasions, appellant’s servants, while operating trains, negligently permitted sparks to escape from the locomotives of appellant’s trains, setting fire to and burning the grass on and injuring the turf or sod of appellee’s pasture, land, amounting in the aggregate to about 320 acres, by which appellee was damaged in the sum of $1050.

Conclusions of Law.—The appellant complains of the action of the court in permitting appellee to prove, over objections, the value of the grass burned, and the difference in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fort Worth & New Orleans Railway Co. v. WallaceTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. HorneTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. HogsettTexas Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cosden Oil Co. v. SidesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Humble Pipe Line Co. v. DayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. NeiserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. PrudeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API