Legal Opinion

Reserve Trucking Co. v. Fairchild

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 1933No. 2253PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By STEVENS, J.

The terms “wilful” and “wanton” conduct are frequently used in such manner as to indicate that the two are synonymous. Such is not the case, however. ^Wilful” conduct imports the element of intentional, purposeful, or deliberate wrongdoing toward the 'person injured, after knowledge *159of his dangerous situation. (Payne v Vance, 103 Oh St 59). "Wanton” conduct imports an entire absence of care for the safety cf others, which exhibits indifference to consequences. (The Higbee Co. v Jackson, 101 Oh St 75, syllabus 3).

It is conceded by counsel in the instant case that the truck…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Paepke v. StadelmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Pecsok v. MillikinOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Wooster Electric Co. v. BurkettOhio Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pettett v. CooperOhio Court of Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API