In Re Marriage of Rifkin
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Goldberg
The issue presented in this appeal is one of law revolving about the often difficult concept of subject matter jurisdiction. These are the pertinent facts.
The litigation commenced as a proceeding for dissolution of marriage brought by Michele Rifkin (petitioner) against Bennett L. Rifkin (respondent). Petitioner was represented by the law firm of Facchini and Minton (attorneys). A judgment for dissolution of the marriage was entered on February 20, 1981. The only provision of the judgment pertaining to the attorney fees is:
“Attorneys Fees
Husband shall pay to the wife’s attorneys, the sum of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- English v. EnglishAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Pettit v. PettitAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Waggoner v. WaggonerIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re Marriage of KekstadtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- In Re Marriage of ArkinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Marriage of BaltzerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- In Re Marriage of PitullaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- In Re Marriage of BennettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Brandon v. CaisseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- In Re Marriage of RobinsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.