Winetroub v. Stanton
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Per curiam
Appellants, Marian Vise Stanton Wine-troub et vir, complain of a judgment of the District Court of Bexar County, Texas, decreeing that appellee, Harold R. Stanton, had shown cause why he should not be held in contempt; that appellants recover nothing from appellee for alleged unpaid child support payments, and that appellants recover nothing from appellee as attorneys’ fees. After examining the record preparatory to writing our opinion on the merits, we have discovered that we do not have jurisdiction of this appeal.
Appellants’ motion for new trial was filed on April 8, 1969, and the trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matlock v. MatlockTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Flowers v. MuseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Whitt v. HartgravesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Alamo Federal Credit Union v. CeledonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Greer v. PoulterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.