Legal Opinion

In re N.R.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 29, 2012No. Nos. 11-FS-1161, 11-FS-1162, 11-FS-1163, 11-FS-1164, 11-FS-1165, 11-FS-1166PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

In In re A.O.T., 10 A.3d 160 (D.C.2010), a division of this court issued an opinion in which it “vacated the judgment [terminating appellant’s parental rights and granting A.O.T.’s petition to adopt appellant’s children] and remand[ed] the cases for a new trial before an associate judge of the Family Court.” Id. at 167. This court’s mandate issued on March 10, 2011. Appellant moved to enforce the mandate on July 20, 2011; no opposition was filed. On August 9, 2011, the presiding judge of the Family Court denied the motion on the ground that it was moot in light of an intervening rule…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lenkin Co. Management v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. In re Petition of A.O.T.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re N.R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API