Legal Opinion

Arturo Fletes-Mora v. Herbert Brownell, Attorney General of the United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1955No. 14454PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge.

The petitioner, Arturo Fletes-Mora, filed a petition in the District Court purportedly under the provisions of 28 U.S. C.A. § 2201 and 8 U.S.C.A. § 1503. 1 The petition alleges that Fletes-Mora “is a constitutional native citizen of the United States,” born on September 23, 1925, at Los Angeles, California, where he still resides. There are conclusions as to a denial of his rights and privileges as a citizen by the Attorney Gen eral, who, it is said, contends that petitioner “is not a citizen of the United States, but an alien and citizen and national of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shaughnessy v. PedreiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. El Dia, Inc. v. Rafael Hernandez ColonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  2. Garcia v. BrownellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  3. Ortega-Morales v. LynchDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2016
  4. Harris v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
  5. Randolph v. WillisDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API