Legal Opinion
Bandholz v. Judge
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 7, 1898PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Ou error to the Hudson Circuit. In a suit against Bandholz, Judge secured verdict and judgment for $470 as the balance due him for work and materials furnished under contract with Bandholz, notwithstanding proof that Bandholz had paid, directly and for materials for which he had become responsible, more than the contract price. The present writ of error reviews exceptions taken at -the trial.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Collins, J.
Both the right and the obligation of the plaintiff below must be discovered in a paper-writing of which the following is a literal copy, viz.:
“ Hoboken, N J., May 27, 1896.
“ Contract
■between G J Bandholz and G A Judge.
“ This is to certify that I. G. A..Judge will do all work, inclu *527ding, Painting Carpenter, Tinning Dumbwaiter galvaniced Iron work Painting aud every thing else to com píete a double and a single Elat for Mrs Annie Menges acoarding to Plans and Specifications furnished by Nat E Smith and Som For the Sum of Fourty nine hundred…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Russell v. RussellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1900