Legal Opinion

Claude v. Handy

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 26, 1896PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County (Roberts, C. J.), by which exceptions to the return of the commissioners to make partition of real estate between tenants in common was overruled and the return ratified and the parcels allotted in accordance therewith. The facts are set forth in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, J.

The bill was filed in this case by the appellee against the appellant and the executors of L. T. H. Irving, alleging that Elizabeth C. Harwood died, intestate, in February, 1886, seized and possessed of certain real estate in Anne Arundel County, leaving the appellant and D. Claude Handy her only heirs at law, each of whom became thereby seized and possessed of one undivided moiety of the said real estate-It further alleged that D. Claude Handy died in May, 1889, leaving a last will and testament, by which he devised all his interest in it to the appellee and charges that said real estate was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. SeipelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
  2. Belt v. BowieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  3. Kane v. ParkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Stannard v. SperrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
  5. Wilhelm v. WilhelmHigh Court of Chancery of Maryland · 1849

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sayers v. PylandTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Von Herberg v. Von HerbergWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Berry v. Tennessee & Coosa RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  4. Harrell v. MasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Ierrobino v. MegaroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API