Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Foster Construction Co. v. Wafer

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 27, 2000No. 00-218Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

| THIBODEAUX, J.,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I agree that Wafer is bound to Foster for expenses totaling $2,262.30. However, I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that Wafer is indebted to Foster for $28,008.50.

The Louisiana Civil Code provides for invalidation of a contract if error affects the cause of the contract. “Cause is the reason why a party obligates himself.” La.Civ.Code art. 1967. Civil Code Article 1949 restates the principles set forth in Articles 1823, 1825 and 1826 of the 1870 Code, and it provides:

Error vitiates consent only when it concerns a cause without…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Osborne v. LadnerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Hampton v. Hampton, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Nugent v. StanleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Marcello v. BussiereSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  5. Sonnier v. BoudreauxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API