Legal Opinion

Ulman v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 13, 1921PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the Criminal Court- of Baltimore City (GrORTER, L).

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

The appellants were indicted in Baltimore City for selling intoxicating liquor without a license. They demurred to this indictment, and the demurrer was overruled, whereupon they filed two special pleas, in which, respectively, they admit that on May 8th, 1920, they sold fifty pints of whisky to Lipman Kiewe, and fifty pints to Jacob Lsgum “for non-beverage purposes, to wit, for medicinal purposes”; that at the time of the said sale they were duly permitted and authorized by permit, issued by John F. Kramer, United States Commissioner of Prohibition, under the National Prohibition Act and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Henderson's TobaccoSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. State v. YewellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
  4. State v. . SmileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  5. Commonwealth v. BarbourCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  3. Weller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  4. State Ex Rel. Gildar v. KrissCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  5. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API