State v. Babbitt
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Allen District Court. Information for selling intoxicating liquor contrary to law. May 2, 1884, the jury found the- defendant Babbitt guilty on the sixth count in the information, and not guilty on the first, second, third, fourth and fifth counts thereof. Motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment were overruled.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Allen District Court. Information for selling intoxicating liquor contrary to law. May 2, 1884, the jury found the- defendant Babbitt guilty on the sixth count in the information, and not guilty on the first, second, third, fourth and fifth counts thereof. Motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment were overruled. May 5, 1884, the court sentenced the defendant to be confined in the jail of Allen county for a period of sixty days from said date, to pay the costs of the prosecution, to enter into a bond in the sum of $2,000 for his good behavior, for a period of two years…
1Opinion of the Court
*254The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
In this case the information was verified as follows:
“State oe Kansas, Allen County, ss. — :G. A. Amos, of lawful age, being sworn, on his oath says, that he is county attorney of Allen county, Kansas, and that the facts set forth in the foregoing information are true.— G. A. Amos. Subscribed and sworn to before me, this 15th day of April, 1884. — J. A. Heath, Notary Public.”
Within the authority of The State v. Gleason, just decided, the verification is sufficient, and the court properly overruled the motion to set aside and quash the…
2Cited by1 opinion
- In re GilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886